From f60f582f1a03a2937037e49b74b9b6c25ac9cc9a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrea Vos Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 23:59:45 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] [en][blog] minor fixes --- locale/en/blog/those-scary-pronouns.md | 2 +- locale/en/blog/throwing-around-queerphobia.md | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/locale/en/blog/those-scary-pronouns.md b/locale/en/blog/those-scary-pronouns.md index a334c8e5d..f5a5498f9 100644 --- a/locale/en/blog/those-scary-pronouns.md +++ b/locale/en/blog/those-scary-pronouns.md @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Yup, she calls it “torture” when someone… asks her a question. And not a d She's not being asked what her genitals are. She's not being asked her gender identity. Someone's literally just trying to establish the basis for the conversation by knowing how to talk to / about her. And the answer is literally two syllables! -Yes, that question _might_ be tricky sometimes, +Yes, that question _might_ be tricky _sometimes_, but she's not a closeted trans person who could feel anxious trying to decide if the situation is safe enough to give someone their real pronouns. No. She's just a brat. A snowflake. diff --git a/locale/en/blog/throwing-around-queerphobia.md b/locale/en/blog/throwing-around-queerphobia.md index 6183def46..3af962747 100644 --- a/locale/en/blog/throwing-around-queerphobia.md +++ b/locale/en/blog/throwing-around-queerphobia.md @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Another thing that we see quite often in people's cards is a description like th Sure, policing someone's neopronouns would be transphobic. And that's why we don't do that. Paw can easily link to paw's pronouns by putting in all five grammatical forms ([paw/paw/paw's/paw's/pawself](https://en.pronouns.page/paw/paw/paw's/paw's/pawself)), -by using a shorthand notation for nameself pronouns ([:paw](https://en.pronouns.page/:paw)), +by using a shorthand notation for the nameself pronouns ([:paw](https://en.pronouns.page/:paw)), or by using a generator that's available in the [Pronouns](/pronouns) section. We talk about it in the instructions in the card editor – if only people would read them before rushing to get angry… @@ -32,4 +32,4 @@ There's _actual_ queerphobia destroying people's lives all around the world – but you use that word to describe a _minor inconvenience_ completely unrelated to your gender or orientation? Think about it… If you message a group of queer volunteers doing their best to create a free website for the community, -and you call them “homophobes”, how do you expect allocishet people take queerphobia seriously? +and you call them “homophobes”, how do you expect allocishet people to take queerphobia seriously?