From 2f18ba0e13995e72dedb5bc26f4fc1213dbd31ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marcus Holland-Moritz Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 23:54:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Update README --- README.md | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 2b8a4632..ff061356 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -797,7 +797,8 @@ So here's a comparison of the extraction speed: sys 0m1.382s So `dwarfsextract` is almost 4 times faster thanks to using multiple -worker threads for decompression. +worker threads for decompression. It's writing about 300 MiB/s in this +example. Another nice feature of `dwarfsextract` is that it allows you to directly output data in an archive format, so you could create a tarball from