From 09f8949ff4f5f2f5e6b95a6d731795fa62fe2c3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Rose <david@ddrose.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 00:42:13 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] new complete_pointers() rules

---
 panda/src/putil/bamReader.cxx | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/panda/src/putil/bamReader.cxx b/panda/src/putil/bamReader.cxx
index 05cd114cde..529be3dd0a 100644
--- a/panda/src/putil/bamReader.cxx
+++ b/panda/src/putil/bamReader.cxx
@@ -439,6 +439,10 @@ read_pointer(DatagramIterator &scan, TypedWritable *for_whom) {
   nassertv(_now_creating != _created_objs.end());
   int requestor_id = (*_now_creating).first;
 
+  /*
+    On reflection, we'll let this go undetected for now.  Maybe we
+    should remove the this pointer from read_pointer() altogether.
+
 #ifndef NDEBUG
   // A bit of sanity checking here: we look up the object ID, and
   // assign the "this" pointer into the record if it's not there
@@ -452,6 +456,7 @@ read_pointer(DatagramIterator &scan, TypedWritable *for_whom) {
     nassertv(created_obj._ptr == for_whom);
   }
 #endif  // NDEBUG
+  */
 
   // Read the object ID, and associate it with the requesting object.
   int object_id = scan.get_uint16();