From c0d78d57d4900d1712ba0e87ef7e1ff3f8dcd5fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: rdb <git@rdb.name>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 15:45:14 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Can we just use streamoff instead of ssize_t?

---
 dtool/src/dtoolutil/pandaFileStreamBuf.cxx | 10 +++-------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/dtool/src/dtoolutil/pandaFileStreamBuf.cxx b/dtool/src/dtoolutil/pandaFileStreamBuf.cxx
index 6893656f49..3b7c14387a 100644
--- a/dtool/src/dtoolutil/pandaFileStreamBuf.cxx
+++ b/dtool/src/dtoolutil/pandaFileStreamBuf.cxx
@@ -26,10 +26,6 @@
 #include <errno.h>
 #endif  // _WIN32
 
-#ifdef _MSC_VER
-typedef SSIZE_T ssize_t;
-#endif
-
 PandaFileStreamBuf::NewlineMode PandaFileStreamBuf::_newline_mode = NM_native;
 
 static const size_t file_buffer_size = 4096;
@@ -444,7 +440,7 @@ overflow(int ch) {
   size_t n = pptr() - pbase();
   if (n != 0) {
     size_t wrote = write_chars(pbase(), n);
-    pbump(-(ssize_t)wrote);
+    pbump(-(streamoff)wrote);
     if (wrote != n) {
       okflag = false;
     }
@@ -478,7 +474,7 @@ sync() {
   size_t n = pptr() - pbase();
 
   size_t wrote = write_chars(pbase(), n);
-  pbump(-(ssize_t)wrote);
+  pbump(-(streamoff)wrote);
 
   if (n != wrote) {
     return EOF;
@@ -500,7 +496,7 @@ underflow() {
 
     // Mark the buffer filled (with buffer_size bytes).
     size_t buffer_size = egptr() - eback();
-    gbump(-(ssize_t)buffer_size);
+    gbump(-(streamoff)buffer_size);
 
     size_t num_bytes = buffer_size;
     size_t read_count = read_chars(gptr(), buffer_size);