cuberite/polarssl
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/cuberite/polarssl.git synced 2025-11-04 04:32:24 -05:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Remove internal references and use milder wording for some comments

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Hanno Becker 2017-10-23 13:23:50 +01:00
parent a6fb089efc
commit e72489de11
1 changed files with 3 additions and 10 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

13
library/ssl_tls.c
View File

@ -3790,11 +3790,6 @@ int mbedtls_ssl_read_record_layer( mbedtls_ssl_context *ssl )
* (2) Alert messages:
* Consume whole record content, in_msglen = 0.
*
* NOTE: This needs to be fixed, since like for
* handshake messages it is allowed to have
* multiple alerts witin a single record.
* Internal reference IOTSSL-1321.
*
* (3) Change cipher spec:
* Consume whole record content, in_msglen = 0.
*
@ -3822,12 +3817,12 @@ int mbedtls_ssl_read_record_layer( mbedtls_ssl_context *ssl )
*/
/* Notes:
* (1) in_hslen is *NOT* necessarily the size of the
* (1) in_hslen is not necessarily the size of the
* current handshake content: If DTLS handshake
* fragmentation is used, that's the fragment
* size instead. Using the total handshake message
* size here is FAULTY and should be changed at
* some point. Internal reference IOTSSL-1414.
* size here is faulty and should be changed at
* some point.
* (2) While it doesn't seem to cause problems, one
* has to be very careful not to assume that in_hslen
* is always <= in_msglen in a sensible communication.
@ -6398,8 +6393,6 @@ int mbedtls_ssl_check_pending( const mbedtls_ssl_context *ssl )
* Case C: A handshake message is being processed.
*/
/* TODO This needs correction in the same way as
* read_record_layer, see IOTSSL-1414 */
if( ssl->in_hslen > 0 && ssl->in_hslen < ssl->in_msglen )
{
MBEDTLS_SSL_DEBUG_MSG( 3, ( "ssl_check_pending: more handshake messages within current record" ) );