VFS: fix pipe resumption delay bug
Commit 723e513 erroneously removed a yield() call from VFS which was necessary to get resumed pipe read/write threads to run before VFS blocks on receive(). The removal caused those threads to run only once VFS received another message, effectively slowing down activity on pipes to a crawl in some cases. Instead of readding the yield() call, this patch restructures the get_work() code to go back through the main message loop even when no new work is received, thus ensuring that newly started threads are always activated without requiring a special case. This fixes #65. Change-Id: I59b7fb9e403d87dba1a5deecb04539cc37517742
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									e1e2bc96d2
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						5055c7ea51
					
				| @ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static void do_init_root(void); | |||||||
| static void handle_work(void (*func)(void)); | static void handle_work(void (*func)(void)); | ||||||
| static void reply(message *m_out, endpoint_t whom, int result); | static void reply(message *m_out, endpoint_t whom, int result); | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| static void get_work(void); | static int get_work(void); | ||||||
| static void service_pm(void); | static void service_pm(void); | ||||||
| static int unblock(struct fproc *rfp); | static int unblock(struct fproc *rfp); | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| @ -74,7 +74,12 @@ int main(void) | |||||||
| 	yield_all();	/* let other threads run */ | 	yield_all();	/* let other threads run */ | ||||||
| 	self = NULL; | 	self = NULL; | ||||||
| 	send_work(); | 	send_work(); | ||||||
| 	get_work(); | 
 | ||||||
|  | 	/* The get_work() function returns TRUE if we have a new message to
 | ||||||
|  | 	 * process. It returns FALSE if it spawned other thread activities. | ||||||
|  | 	 */ | ||||||
|  | 	if (!get_work()) | ||||||
|  | 		continue; | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| 	transid = TRNS_GET_ID(m_in.m_type); | 	transid = TRNS_GET_ID(m_in.m_type); | ||||||
| 	if (IS_VFS_FS_TRANSID(transid)) { | 	if (IS_VFS_FS_TRANSID(transid)) { | ||||||
| @ -476,28 +481,23 @@ void thread_cleanup(void) | |||||||
| /*===========================================================================*
 | /*===========================================================================*
 | ||||||
|  *				get_work				     * |  *				get_work				     * | ||||||
|  *===========================================================================*/ |  *===========================================================================*/ | ||||||
| static void get_work() | static int get_work(void) | ||||||
| { | { | ||||||
|   /* Normally wait for new input.  However, if 'reviving' is
 |   /* Normally wait for new input.  However, if 'reviving' is nonzero, a
 | ||||||
|    * nonzero, a suspended process must be awakened. |    * suspended process must be awakened.  Return TRUE if there is a message to | ||||||
|  |    * process (usually newly received, but possibly a resumed request), or FALSE | ||||||
|  |    * if a thread for other activities has been spawned instead. | ||||||
|    */ |    */ | ||||||
|   int r, found_one, proc_p; |   int r, proc_p; | ||||||
|   register struct fproc *rp; |   register struct fproc *rp; | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
|   while (reviving != 0) { |   if (reviving != 0) { | ||||||
| 	found_one = FALSE; |  | ||||||
| 
 |  | ||||||
| 	/* Find a suspended process. */ | 	/* Find a suspended process. */ | ||||||
| 	for (rp = &fproc[0]; rp < &fproc[NR_PROCS]; rp++) | 	for (rp = &fproc[0]; rp < &fproc[NR_PROCS]; rp++) | ||||||
| 		if (rp->fp_pid != PID_FREE && (rp->fp_flags & FP_REVIVED)) { | 		if (rp->fp_pid != PID_FREE && (rp->fp_flags & FP_REVIVED)) | ||||||
| 			found_one = TRUE; /* Found a suspended process */ | 			return unblock(rp); /* So main loop can process job */ | ||||||
| 			if (unblock(rp)) |  | ||||||
| 				return;	/* So main loop can process job */ |  | ||||||
| 			send_work(); |  | ||||||
| 		} |  | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| 	if (!found_one)	/* Consistency error */ | 	panic("VFS: get_work couldn't revive anyone"); | ||||||
| 		panic("VFS: get_work couldn't revive anyone"); |  | ||||||
|   } |   } | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
|   for(;;) { |   for(;;) { | ||||||
| @ -510,11 +510,6 @@ static void get_work() | |||||||
| 	if (proc_p < 0 || proc_p >= NR_PROCS) fp = NULL; | 	if (proc_p < 0 || proc_p >= NR_PROCS) fp = NULL; | ||||||
| 	else fp = &fproc[proc_p]; | 	else fp = &fproc[proc_p]; | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| 	if (m_in.m_type == EDEADSRCDST) { |  | ||||||
| 		printf("VFS: failed ipc_sendrec\n"); |  | ||||||
| 		return;	/* Failed 'ipc_sendrec' */ |  | ||||||
| 	} |  | ||||||
| 
 |  | ||||||
| 	/* Negative who_p is never used to access the fproc array. Negative
 | 	/* Negative who_p is never used to access the fproc array. Negative
 | ||||||
| 	 * numbers (kernel tasks) are treated in a special way. | 	 * numbers (kernel tasks) are treated in a special way. | ||||||
| 	 */ | 	 */ | ||||||
| @ -536,8 +531,9 @@ static void get_work() | |||||||
| 			fproc[who_p].fp_endpoint, who_e); | 			fproc[who_p].fp_endpoint, who_e); | ||||||
| 	} | 	} | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| 	return; | 	return TRUE; | ||||||
|   } |   } | ||||||
|  |   /* NOTREACHED */ | ||||||
| } | } | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| /*===========================================================================*
 | /*===========================================================================*
 | ||||||
|  | |||||||
		Loading…
	
	
			
			x
			
			
		
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user
	 David van Moolenbroek
						David van Moolenbroek