0a6a1f1d05
This brings our tree to NetBSD 7.0, as found on -current on the 10-10-2015. This updates: - LLVM to 3.6.1 - GCC to GCC 5.1 - Replace minix/commands/zdump with usr.bin/zdump - external/bsd/libelf has moved to /external/bsd/elftoolchain/ - Import ctwm - Drop sprintf from libminc Change-Id: I149836ac18e9326be9353958bab9b266efb056f0
56 lines
1.3 KiB
C++
56 lines
1.3 KiB
C++
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fms-compatibility -fsyntax-only -verify %s
|
|
|
|
namespace basic {
|
|
struct C {
|
|
static void foo2() {}
|
|
};
|
|
template <typename T>
|
|
struct A {
|
|
typedef C D;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
template <typename T>
|
|
struct B : A<T> {
|
|
void foo() {
|
|
D::foo2(); // expected-warning {{use of undeclared identifier 'D'; unqualified lookup into dependent bases of class template 'B' is a Microsoft extension}}
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
template struct B<int>; // Instantiation has no warnings.
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace nested_nodep_base {
|
|
// There are limits to our hacks, MSVC accepts this, but we don't.
|
|
struct A {
|
|
struct D { static void foo2(); };
|
|
};
|
|
template <typename T>
|
|
struct B : T {
|
|
struct C {
|
|
void foo() {
|
|
D::foo2(); // expected-error {{use of undeclared identifier 'D'}}
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
template struct B<A>; // Instantiation has no warnings.
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace nested_dep_base {
|
|
// We actually accept this because the inner class has a dependent base even
|
|
// though it isn't a template.
|
|
struct A {
|
|
struct D { static void foo2(); };
|
|
};
|
|
template <typename T>
|
|
struct B {
|
|
struct C : T {
|
|
void foo() {
|
|
D::foo2(); // expected-warning {{use of undeclared identifier 'D'; unqualified lookup into dependent bases of class template 'C' is a Microsoft extension}}
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
template struct B<A>; // Instantiation has no warnings.
|
|
}
|