We actually need to leak this lock, because we need to call this at static destruction time, and we can't guarantee static destruction order.
This reverts commit afed80e83a5c033f03497bcf38353794e662eedf.
See #550. Now that we use the Vista API for condition variables, the only place where the distinction is still relevant is Windows XP, and it's just not worth it for that one corner case.
Since in Python 3 `str == bytes` no longer holds true, I modified
the source to write a text file, which it actually is, instead of a
binary file.
Closes#553Fixes#543
Checks if the value of Config.prc for `depth-bits` is `1` and sets it
manually to 24.
This prevents getting a 16 bit depth buffer on macos
Intended to address #501Closes#551
This uses SRWLock on Vista and above, and uses a hand-rolled implementation on Windows XP that uses Events (and a spinlock, if this is a multi-core system).
Since SRWLocks aren't recursive, ReMutexWin32Impl has been added to implement recursive mutices, using old-fashioned critical sections.
MutexImpl now has a constexpr constructor on all implementations.
As far as I know, none of the implementations strictly require this, and this may cause the waiting thread to wake up only for it to immediately have to wait for the lock again.
This change brings our implementation closer to C++11 std::condition_variable semantics.
This is not intended to be used just yet in 1.10, but already added in preparation for changes on master to support #546. I'm just allowing Panda to parse the syntax ahead of time to reduce potential .egg incompatiblities.
Need to find a better solution for the interior point calculation when the capsule is hitting a polygon edge with the cylindrical part. The current approach pushes the capsule back too much.
If too many shadow-casting lights are active, too many TEXCOORD varyings will be used and a shader compilation error will be displayed. Instead, Panda will now just do the calculation in the fragment shader if not enough varyings are available. It's slower, but better than crashing.
